People v. Solis CA4/1

Filed 8/20/20 P. v. Solis CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D076936

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. SCD283185, SCS309290, SCS306656, SCOTT SHERIDAN SOLIS, SCE392324)

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgement of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Carlos O. Armour, Judge. Affirmed. Arthur Martin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. This appeal involves four different cases which were ultimately resolved by plea agreements with a total stipulated sentence.

STATEMENT OF FACTS The guilty pleas in each case are as follows: 1. Case No. SCS306656 Solis pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful possession of ammunition

(Pen. Code,1 § 30305, subd. (a)(1)). 2. Case No. SCE392324 Solis pleaded guilty to assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(4)). 3. Case No. SCS309290 Solis pleaded guilty to one count of discharging a firearm in a grossly negligent manner (§ 246.3, subd. (a)). 4. Case No. SCD283185 Solis pleaded guilty to battery with serious bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(4)). Solis also admitted an enhancement for personally inflicting great bodily injury (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)). The parties stipulated to a total term for all cases of six years eight months. The court sentenced Solis to a total term of six years eight months as agreed in the plea bargain and ordered various fines, fees and assessments. Solis filed timely notices of appeal but did not obtain certificates of probable cause. (§ 1237.5.) Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), indicating counsel has been unable to identify any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to review the record for error as mandated by Wende. We offered Solis the opportunity to file his own brief on appeal, but he has not responded.