Willow Glen Tresle Conservancy v. City of San Jose

Filed 6/9/20 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

WILLOW GLEN TRESTLE H047068 CONSERVANCY et al., (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. CV335801) Plaintiffs and Appellants, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION v. AND DENYING REHEARING

CITY OF SAN JOSE et al., [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

Defendants and Respondents.

THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 18, 2020, be modified as follows: 1. On page 5, first full paragraph, replace the fourth sentence which begins with “And, as the,” with the following sentence: “And, as the Conservancy concedes, CDFW’s environmental review in connection with the SAA in this case was limited to fish and wildlife resources.” This modification does not affect the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.

Dated: _______________________________ Mihara, J.

_______________________________ Premo, Acting P. J.

_______________________________ Elia, J.

Willow Glen Trestle Conservancy v. City of San Jose H047068

2

Trial Court: Santa Clara County Superior Court

Trial Judge: Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle

Attorney for Plaintiffs and Appellants: Susan Brandt-Hawley Brandt-Hawley Law Group

Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents: Office of the City Attorney Richard Doyle City Attorney

Nora Frimann Assistant City Attorney

Margo Laskowska Senior Deputy City Attorney

Elisa Tolentino Senior Deputy City Attorney

Kathryn J. Zoglin Senior Deputy City Attorney

Willow Glen Trestle Conservancy v. City of San Jose H047068

3

Filed 5/18/20 (unmodified opinion) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION