People v. Maya
Filed 3/21/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B290589 (Super. Ct. No. 2010031209) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County)
v.
MISAEL VENCES MAYA,
Defendant and Appellant.
A model prisoner is not necessarily a model citizen. Misael Vences Maya appeals an order denying a motion to expunge his misdemeanor conviction for possession of methamphetamine. (Pen. Code, § 1203.4a [rehabilitation of misdemeanants]; Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).)1 We affirm. This appeal concerns the trial court’s denial of Maya’s request to expunge his conviction for possession of methamphetamine following his successful motion to reduce the felony conviction to a misdemeanor. In ruling against Maya, the
All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless 1
otherwise stated.
trial judge stated that Maya could not establish that he had lived “an honest and upright life” as required by section 1203.4a, subdivision (a) because he has been in continuous state or federal custody following his 2011 conviction. The court later denied Maya’s motion for reconsideration, noting that it was denying relief in the exercise of its discretion. Maya now appeals the denial of his expungement motion and motion for reconsideration. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On June 30, 2011, Maya pleaded guilty to driving under the influence with six prior driving-under-the-influence convictions, and possession of methamphetamine. (Veh. Code, §§ 23152, subd. (a), 23550; Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a).) Maya also admitted that he had served two prior prison terms. (§ 667.5, subd. (b).) During the plea colloquy, the prosecutor advised Maya of the immigration consequences of his plea, including possible deportation. On July 7, 2011, the trial court denied probation and sentenced Maya to four years eight months imprisonment, consisting of a three-year upper term for the driving-under-the- influence conviction, an eight-month consecutive term for the drug conviction, and a consecutive one-year term for one prior prison term allegation. The court struck the remaining prior prison term allegation and granted the prosecutor’s motion to dismiss the remaining charges and allegations. The court also imposed various fines and fees and awarded Maya 571 days of presentence custody credit. On December 25, 2012, Maya completed his term of imprisonment. On that date and continuously since that time, the United States Department of Homeland Security received custody of Maya. The Department issued a removal notice
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)