People v. Harris

Filed 4/27/18 (unmodified version attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (El Dorado) ----

THE PEOPLE, C079470

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. P13CRF0031, P13CRF0343) v. ORDER MODIFYING COLLEEN ANN HARRIS, OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 23, 2018, be modified as follows: On page 2, footnote 2, first sentence, put a period after “expires” and delete the rest of the first sentence: “which is 90 days after the remittitur is issued” so that the sentence now reads: “A case is final when the time for petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari expires.”

1

There is no change in the judgment. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Robie, Acting P. J.

/s/ Duarte, J.

/s/ Renner, J.

2

Filed 4/23/18 (unmodified version) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (El Dorado)

THE PEOPLE, C079470

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. P13CRF0031, P13CRF0343) v.

COLLEEN ANN HARRIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Motion to recall the remittitur. Denied.

Charles R. Khoury Jr., for Defendant and Appellant.

Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Carlos A. Martinez, Catherine Tennant Nieto, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

In People v. Woods (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 1080, we held that Senate Bill No. 620 and the associated amendment to Penal Code1 section 12022.53 (effective January 1,