In re E.B. CA1/5

Filed 9/15/16 In re E.B. CA1/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re E.B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A147353 E.B., (Lake County Defendant and Appellant. Super. Ct. No. JV-311294)

Appellant E.B. appeals following a jurisdictional admission and the juvenile court’s subsequent dispositional order. Appellant’s counsel has raised no issue on appeal and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Appellate counsel advised appellant of his right to file a supplementary brief to bring to this court’s attention any issue he believes deserves review. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106.) Appellant has not filed such a brief. We have reviewed the entire record, find no arguable issues, and affirm.

1

BACKGROUND On November 6, 2015, an amended Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, subdivision (a)1 petition was filed charging appellant, then 16 years old, with one misdemeanor count of vandalism (Pen. Code, § 594, subd. (a)) and one misdemeanor count of trespassing (id., § 602, subd. (m)). According to the probation report, the vandalism charge was based on an August 2015 incident involving damage to an elementary school. Appellant matched the description provided by witnesses and, in a police interview on the day of the incident, admitted being at the elementary school earlier that day, said he was angry and started to throw things after his girlfriend broke up with him, and admitted the damage “was probably” caused by him. The trespassing charge was based on a September 2015 incident in which appellant and others admitted to meeting without permission on high school property to smoke marijuana. On November 30, 2015, appellant admitted the vandalism charge and the juvenile court dismissed the trespassing charge. The probation report stated appellant was previously placed on probation twice, for second degree burglary and challenging a fight on school grounds. The report noted appellant had twice completed substance abuse counseling programs, apparently as part of these two probation terms. Despite these programs, appellant tested positive for drugs in August 2015 and, in December 2015, admitted daily use of marijuana and occasional use of alcohol. In December 2015, the juvenile court adjudged appellant a ward of the court and ordered him to remain in the custody of his parents under the supervision of a probation officer. The court ordered appellant’s eligibility to acquire a driver’s license delayed for one year, pursuant to Vehicle Code section 13202.6; imposed a restitution fine of fifty dollars; and directed restitution to the school district in an amount determined by the probation officer, with the opportunity for review by the court. The court imposed terms