In re C.G. CA2/5

Filed 9/8/16 In re C.G. CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re C.G., a Person Coming Under the B269536 Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. DK13950)

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JUSTIN G.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Nichelle L. Blackwell, Commissioner. Affirmed. John L. Dodd, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Mary C. Wickham, County Counsel, R. Keith Davis, Acting Assistant County Counsel, Tyson B. Nelson, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent. _______________________ Justin G. (father) appeals from a dispositional order requiring him to submit to

random drug testing. Father is the presumed father of the minor, C.G., who was declared a dependent under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b)1 based on allegations that H.H. (mother) abused drugs and suffered from mental and emotional problems. Father contends the court abused its discretion because it dismissed allegations concerning father’s marijuana use, and there was no evidence father’s medical marijuana use posed any risk to the minor. We find no abuse of discretion, and affirm the court’s order.

FACTS