People v. Wilson CA4/1

California Court of Appeal Aug 26, 2016 No. D069709Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's convictions for possession of an assault weapon and carrying a concealed firearm, finding no reasonably arguable appellate issues after an independent review of the record.

Issues

Whether sufficient evidence supported the jury's convictions.
Whether trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to the jury handling the firearm and magazine.
Whether the electronic search conditions of probation were unconstitutionally overbroad and vague.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Our independent review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the issues referred to by appellate counsel, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues.”

“The judgment (order granting formal probation) is affirmed.”

Filed 8/26/16 P. v. Wilson CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D069709

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCD260631) v.

RONZELL WILSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, David M.

Rubin, Judge. Affirmed.

Kristen Owen, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for the Plaintiff and Respondent.

Ronzell Wilson appeals after a jury found him guilty of possessing an assault

weapon (Pen. Code, § 30605, subd. (a)) and the misdemeanor crime of having a

concealed firearm in a vehicle (Pen. Code, § 25400, subd. (a)(3)). The trial court placed

Wilson on three years of formal probation and committed him to 90 days in jail. The

court imposed various fines and fees and awarded 13 days of credit. Among other

conditions of probation, the court ordered Wilson not to install kill switches on any

electronic devices, and not to erase any social media accounts while on probation.

Wilson's court-appointed counsel has filed a brief raising no issues, but seeking

People v. Wilson CA4/1

AI Brief

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D069709

RONZELL WILSON,

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

DISCUSSION

DISPOSITION

MCCONNELL, P. J.

HALLER, J.

O'ROURKE, J.

AI Brief