People v. Rivas CA4/3
Filed 8/25/16 P. v. Rivas CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, G052012
v. (Super. Ct. No. 12WF2895)
JAMES ANTHONY RIVAS, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Lance Jensen, Judge. Affirmed. Richard Power, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Kristen Chenelia, Tami Falkenstein Hennick and Teresa Torreblanca, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
A jury convicted James Anthony Rivas of attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, and mayhem. Rivas argues the court should have given attempted robbery instructions because the prosecutor argued attempted robbery was a possible motive for the attempted murder. We disagree and affirm the judgment. FACTS One October night, Rivas attacked a female jogger with a knife. Although he managed to inflict several stab wounds, the victim escaped. The vicitm told investigating officers she thought the man intended to rob her. She offered him her iPod and cell phone, but that did not stop the attack. When police officers later located and arrested him, Rivas asked them, “How did you catch me?” Rivas told the officers he had been drinking with friends all day, and he sometimes forgets things after drinking. He only remembered coming home and throwing his knife on the ground outside his house before going to bed. Officers found a couple of items that linked Rivas to the crime. They found a knife near the location of Rivas’s arrest. The knife had Rivas’s and the victim’s blood on it. In Rivas’s house, the officers found a pair of blood-stained gloves. The blood on the gloves also matched Rivas and the victim. Rivas did not testify at trial. His friend, Justin Yorba, said he and Christian Lloyd spent the afternoon of the attack with Rivas at Yorba’s house. At one point, they drank some beer, and smoked a joint. Rivas showed Yorba his knife. Rivas and Lloyd left Yorba’s house around 7:30 p.m. on their bicycles. Rivas told Yorba they were going to Rossmoor to get some money. Yorba remembered that Rivas was very intoxicated. DISCUSSION The prosecutor charged Rivas with attempted murder, mayhem, and assault with a deadly weapon. Defense counsel asked the court to instruct the jury on attempted robbery as a lesser offense of attempted murder. The court refused because attempted robbery is not a lesser included offense of attempted murder.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)