People v. Washington CA4/1

Filed 7/19/16 P. v. Washington CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D069023

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCD261196) v.

DANNY WASHINGTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Michael T.

Smyth, Judge. Affirmed.

Jan B. Norman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Danny Washington appeals after a jury found him guilty of pimping in violation of

Penal Code section 266h, subdivision (a).1 The jury deadlocked on a pandering charge

(§ 266i, subd. (a)(6)). The trial court later dismissed the pandering charge and prior

prison term allegations. The trial court sentenced Washington to the low term of three

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

years and imposed various fines and fees. Washington received a total of 432 days of

pre-sentence custody credits (216 actual plus 216 conduct under section 4019).

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Galina Sieck became Washington's girlfriend and the couple shared the money