In re D.G. CA2/4
Filed 7/6/16 In re D.G. CA2/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
In re D.G., a Person Coming Under the B267732 Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YJ38093)
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
D.G.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Irma J. Brown, Judge. Affirmed. Bruce G. Finebaum, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant D.G., a minor, requested that her probation supervision be transferred to San Bernardino County so she could reside with her grandmother and aunt. The juvenile court granted the request, and D.G. appealed. D.G.’s counsel filed an opening brief that raised no issues and requested independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende ). We affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On December 4, 2014, the Los Angeles District Attorney filed a petition alleging that D.G., then age 15, violated Penal Code sections 211 (second degree robbery on Oct. 6, 2014, count 1, a felony), 459 (second degree commercial burglary on Oct. 6, 2014, count 2, a felony), and 459 (second degree commercial burglary on Oct. 3, 2014, count 3, a felony). On December 24, 2014, D.G. was released to her mother’s custody pending the next hearing, with certain restrictions imposed by the court. A probation report stated that on October 6, 2014, D.G. had stolen beer from a market, and attempted to steal beer from the same market a few days later. The report also stated that on December 12, 2014, D.G. was involved in an incident involving a known gang member, in which D.G. attempted to steal a car. Police determined that D.G. was attempting to steal the car for the benefit of the gang. The probation report also stated that D.G.’s mother (mother) said D.G. had been out of control at home. Mother suspected D.G. was using alcohol and marijuana. D.G. had been expelled from school for truancy. The probation report also stated that D.G. “violated her house arrest by leaving home without permission” so “the minor’s house arrest was violated, and that is why she is currently at juvenile hall.” On January 29, 2015, D.G. admitted count 1 for second degree robbery (Penal Code section 211, a felony), and the other two counts were dismissed. There is no indication in the record that D.G. was charged for the car-related incident. D.G. was again placed on home detention. On February 17, 2015, another petition was filed alleging that D.G. violated Penal Code sections 484(a) and 490.2 (petty theft, a misdemeanor) on February 13, 2015 by 2
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)