Peterson v. Ball

California Supreme Court Jan 30, 1931 No. Docket No. L.A. 10958.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants based on the authority of the companion case, Fred E. Peterson v. W.F. Ball (L.A. No. 10957).

Issues

Whether the judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants should be affirmed based on the legal principles established in a companion case.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“On the authority of the prior action, the judgment herein is affirmed.”

THE COURT.

In this action the same questions are presented as were before the court in the case of Fred E. Peterson v. W.F. Ball (L.A. No. 10957), ante, p. 461 [296 P. 291], this day decided. The parties are practically the same in each action and the only difference in the two relates to the amount of the indebtedness claimed to have been illegally incurred. The same procedure was had in this action as was taken in the prior action, L.A. No. 10957, and resulted in a judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendants herein. [1] On the authority of the prior action, the judgment herein is affirmed.

*Page 1

Peterson v. Ball

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief