Arthur v. City of Petaluma
California Supreme Court May 31, 1917 No. S. F. No. 8174.Published
Before: Angellotti
Synopsis
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to compel the allowance and payment of a claim against the City of Petaluma.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Lippitt & Lippitt, R. L. Thompson, and Newton A. Johnson, for Petitioner.
G. P. Hall, W. P. Cowan, and E. J. Dole, for Respondents.
The full opinion text for this decision hasn’t been ingested yet. Case metadata and citations are shown above.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)