State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Superior Court

[109]

THE COURT.

The purpose of this petition for a writ of prohibition is to arrest further proceedings in the respondent Superior Court in the matter of the application of one Charles Henry Wood for a writ of review pending in said court. The petitioners are the members of and constitute the California State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, functioning pursuant to an initiative statute adopted at the general election on November 7, 1922 (Stats. 1923, p. lxxxviii).

In June, 1926, a proceeding authorized by section 10 of said act was commenced before said board to revoke a license to practice chiropractic theretofore issued to said Charles Henry Wood, and which resulted in the revocation of said license. Thereafter Wood filed in the respondent court a petition for a writ of review to annul the order of the board revoking his license. The writ was issued and respondent therein, petitioners here, were directed to certify to the court the transcript of the record in the matter of the revocation of said license. The present proceeding was then instituted to prohibit the respondent Superior Court from carrying forward the

certiorari

proceedings pending therein. The petitioners herein base their application on the ground that the Board of Chiropractic Examiners does not exercise judicial functions under the statute creating it, and that therefore

certiorari

under sections 1067 and 1068 of the Code of Civil Procedure will not lie to review the action of that board.

The respondent Superior Court has constitutional jurisdiction in

certiorari

(Const., art. VI, sec. 5). It may err in the exercise of its jurisdiction, but an appeal will lie from its determination.

No special circumstances appear herein which would seem to justify the writ of prohibition. This is especially true since it has been repeatedly held that boards, such as the petitioner board, empowered to revoke licenses previously granted, may have their decisions subjected to revision by way of