California Midland Railway Co. v. Smith

California Supreme Court Sep 5, 1918 No. Sac. No. 2575. Department Two. Sac. No. 2576. Department Two.Published

Before: THE COURT.

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the trial court's judgment and orders denying motions for a new trial based on the stipulation of the parties to follow the decision in Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith.

Issues

Whether the judgment and orders of the trial court should be affirmed based on the parties' stipulation to follow the decision in a related case.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“the judgment and the orders denying motions for a new trial, given and made by the trial court in each of the above-entitled actions, be and the same are hereby affirmed.”

By stipulation of the parties in the above two causes, it is agreed that the decision in the case of Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith, ante, p. 786, [175 P. 13], shall govern and control the disposition of said two appeals, and the judgment and order of the trial court in said latter case having this day been affirmed, it is hereby ordered that the judgment and the orders denying motions for a new trial, given and made by the trial court in each of the above-entitled actions, be and the same are hereby affirmed.

*Page 1

California Midland Railway Co. v. Smith

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief