Hutt v. Corser

California Supreme Court Mar 31, 1933 No. Docket No. L.A. 13098.Published

Before: PRESTON, J.

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment for the plaintiff in an action to quiet title because the defendant's brief failed to present a question of law and the evidence supported the respondent's claims.

Issues

Whether the defendant's brief presented a valid question of law for appellate review.
Whether the evidence supported the trial court's judgment for the plaintiff.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“His brief presents no question of law but is at most an attempt to recite the evidence in the case, which on its face discloses not only conflicting evidence but a preponderance thereof in favor of respondent's claims.”

“The judgment is affirmed.”

[1] Action to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. His brief presents no question of law but is at most an attempt to recite the evidence in the case, which on its face discloses not only conflicting evidence but a preponderance thereof in favor of respondent's claims.

The motion to dismiss the appeal heretofore made herein, and submitted, is denied. The judgment is affirmed.

Curtis, J., Langdon, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., Thompson, J., and Waste, C.J., concurred. *Page 607

Hutt v. Corser

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief