Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.
Before: Sloss
Synopsis
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
SLOSS, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from an order granting an injunction
pendente Ute.
The injunction restrained the enforcement of an assessment levied by the board of directors of the Imperial Irrigation District. The trial of the action resulted in a judgment in favor of the defendants, and we have this day filed an opinion affirming such judgment.
(Imperial Land Co.
v.
Imperial Irr. Dist., ante,
p. 668, [161 Pac. 116].)
The judgment on the merits, which now becomes final, ended the life of the temporary injunction. The defendants have, accordingly, secured every substantial benefit which they could obtain by a reversal of the order which they seek to review by the present appeal. The rights of the parties would not be affected in any way by either an affirmance or a reversal of such order. In this state of facts, the questions presented are merely moot or academic, and the court will not exercise its appellate jurisdiction for their decision.
(Foster
v.
Smith,
115 Cal. 611, [47 Pac. 591];
Bradley
v.
Voorsanger,
143 Cal. 214, [76 Pac. 1031].)
The appeal is dismissed.
Shaw, J., and Lawlor, J., concurred.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)