Simpson v. City and County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court Jan 8, 1917 No. S. F. No. 6817.Published

Before: THE COURT.

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court reversed the judgment based on the parties' stipulation that the case involves the same facts and legal issues as the companion case, Hayne et al. v. City and County of San Francisco.

Issues

Whether the tunnel assessment at issue is valid under the same facts and legal principles as those addressed in Hayne et al. v. City and County of San Francisco.

Disposition. reversed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The parties have stipulated that the facts are the same, except as to the parties and the amount of the assessment, and that the decision in this case shall be the same as in No. 6802.”

“The judgment is reversed.”

This appeal involves the same tunnel assessment that was under consideration in Hayne et al. v. City and County of SanFrancisco, ante, p. 185, this day decided. The parties have stipulated that the facts are the same, except as to the parties and the amount of the assessment, and that the decision in this case shall be the same as in No. 6802. The same judgment is therefore given.

The judgment is reversed.

Rehearing denied. *Page 816

Simpson v. City and County of San Francisco

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief