Credit Clearance Bureau v. City County, San Francisco

California Supreme Court Apr 27, 1915 No. S.F. No. 6758.Published

Before: THE COURT.

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court held that the trial court erred in sustaining a general demurrer to the plaintiff's complaint, as the complaint was substantively identical to the one considered in the companion case of Otis v. City and County of San Francisco.

Issues

Whether the trial court erred in sustaining a general demurrer to the plaintiff's complaint.

Disposition. Reversed and remanded

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“the court erred and the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to the trial court to overrule the defendant's demurrer.”

In this action the court sustained a general demurrer to plaintiff's complaint, which complaint is in all essentials the same as that considered in Otis v. City and County of SanFrancisco (S.F. No. 6498), ante, p. 98, [148 P. 933].

For the reasons therein given the court erred and the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to the trial court to overrule the defendant's demurrer. *Page 804

Credit Clearance Bureau v. City County, San Francisco

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief