Golden State Bank v. Dolph

California Supreme Court Apr 6, 1927 No. Docket No. L.A. 8516.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment in favor of the plaintiff on a promissory note based on the authority of a related case, The Anaheim National Bank v. Dolph.

Issues

Whether the judgment in favor of the plaintiff on a promissory note should be affirmed based on the arguments and briefs submitted in a related case.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“On the authority of said case, the judgment is affirmed.”

MEMORANDUM CASES. THE COURT.

[1] This is an appeal on the judgment-roll from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff on a promissory note. The facts are the same as those involved in The Anaheim National Bank v. Dolph,ante, p. 17 [255 P. 184], with the exception of the amount of the note. By stipulation this appeal was submitted for decision on the arguments and briefs in that case. On the authority of said case, the judgment is affirmed.

Golden State Bank v. Dolph

AI Brief

MEMORANDUM CASES. THE COURT.

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief