In Re Kaster

California Supreme Court May 11, 1921 No. Crim. No. 2377.Published

Before: THE COURT.

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court denied the petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, finding that the issues raised had been correctly addressed and resolved in a prior opinion by the district court of appeal.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to discharge on habeas corpus based on the matters alleged in his petition.

Disposition. Denied

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The application for a writ is denied.”

“All points available to petitioner on habeas corpus are considered in that opinion, which, to our minds, correctly states the law in regard thereto.”

The petitioner heretofore sought his discharge on habeascorpus on account of the matters alleged in his petition filed herein, at the hands of the district court of appeal of the third appellate district. After a hearing that court on May 2, 1921, discharged the writ and remanded the petitioner. The court in so doing filed a written opinion. (In re Kaster onHabeas Corpus, No. 556, filed May 2, 1921 (Cal.App.),198 P. 1029.) [1] All points available to petitioner on habeas corpus are considered in that opinion, which, to our minds, correctly states the law in regard thereto.

The application for a writ is denied.

All the Justices concurred.

In Re Kaster

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief