Salvador v. York

California Court of Appeal Mar 12, 1934 No. Docket No. 7960.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court dismissed the appeal because the appellant abandoned the proceedings by failing to file briefs, request extensions, or respond to an order to show cause.

Issues

Whether an appeal should be dismissed for failure to prosecute and abandonment.

Disposition. dismissed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The appeal herein to all intents and purposes has been abandoned.”

“Therefore, under the authority granted by section I of Rule V of the Rules for the Supreme Court and the District Courts of Appeal, the appeal is dismissed.”

THE COURT.

The appeal herein to all intents and purposes has been abandoned. [1] The transcript was filed on May 20, 1931, but thereafter no steps were taken in furtherance of the appeal. No briefs have been filed nor extensions of time applied for or granted; nor was any response made to the order heretofore issued to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. Therefore, under the authority granted by section I of Rule V of the Rules for the Supreme Court and the District Courts of Appeal, the appeal is dismissed.

Salvador v. York

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief