People v. Wheeler

California Court of Appeal Dec 21, 1933 No. Docket No. 1299.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgments and orders of the trial court because the appellants failed to file an opening brief within the time prescribed by law.

Issues

Whether the judgments and orders should be affirmed due to the appellants' failure to file a brief on appeal.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“No briefs having been filed and the time therefor having expired, pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgments and the orders are affirmed.”

THE COURT.

The appellants were convicted in the Superior Court of Sacramento County of a felony, to wit: Robbery of the first degree.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed in this court September 15, 1933. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellants. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on December 4, 1933.

No briefs having been filed and the time therefor having expired, pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgments and the orders are affirmed. *Page 16

People v. Wheeler

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief