Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corporation

California Court of Appeal Dec 14, 1932 No. Docket No. 8664.Published

Before: THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court dismissed the appeal because the facts and legal questions were identical to those in Iske v. Stockwell-Kling Corp.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be dismissed based on the identical facts and questions presented in Iske v. Stockwell-Kling Corp.

Disposition. dismissed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The facts in this case and the questions involved are identical with those in the case of Iske v. Stockwell-KlingCorp., ante, p. 192 [17 P.2d 203], this day filed, and for the reasons therein stated the appeal in this case is dismissed.”

MEMORANDUM CASES. [1] The facts in this case and the questions involved are identical with those in the case of Iske v. Stockwell-KlingCorp., ante, p. 192 [17 P.2d 203], this day filed, and for the reasons therein stated the appeal in this case is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 9, 1933. *Page 780

Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corporation

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief