Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

California Court of Appeal Apr 15, 1931 No. Docket No. 7911.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court held that the Industrial Accident Commission's finding of a new and further disability was supported by sufficient evidence, specifically the attending physician's testimony that the initial injury proximately caused the second.

Issues

Whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the Commission's finding and award for a new and further disability.

Disposition. Petition denied.

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The testimony given by the attending physician is more than ample to support the conclusion of the Commission, that the first injury was the proximate cause of the second.”

THE COURT.

Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission.

[1] It is claimed that there is no evidence to sustain the Commission's finding and award for a new and further disability. The testimony given by the attending physician is more than ample to support the conclusion of the Commission, that the first injury was the proximate cause of the second.

Petition denied. *Page 436

Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief