People v. Beach

California Court of Appeal Dec 4, 1928 No. Docket No. 1056.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendants' convictions for second-degree burglary because no brief was filed and no appearance was made on behalf of the appellants.

Issues

Whether the judgments and order should be affirmed when appellants fail to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgments and the order are affirmed.”

THE COURT.

The defendants were convicted in the superior court of Trinity County of a felony, to wit: the crime of burglary of the second degree.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed in this court September 12, 1928. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellants. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on December 4, 1928. No appearance was made for appellants at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgments and the order are affirmed. *Page 259

People v. Beach

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief