People v. Griffin

California Court of Appeal Dec 5, 1932 No. Docket No. 1237.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the appellant's conviction for second-degree burglary due to the appellant's failure to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Issues

Whether a criminal conviction should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.”

THE COURT.

The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Sacramento County of a felony, to wit: Burglary of the second degree.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed in this court October 14, 1932. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on December 5, 1932. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.

People v. Griffin

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief