Beard v. Lancaster Midway Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal Apr 2, 1925 No. Docket No. 4370.Published

Before: Conrey

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court held that section 1183 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not impose personal liability on property owners for contracts made by lessees, and that a recorded deed of trust maintains priority over subsequent mechanic's liens.

Issues

Whether section 1183 of the Code of Civil Procedure imposes personal liability on a property owner for labor or materials furnished to a lessee.
Whether a recorded deed of trust is superior to mechanic's liens arising from work performed for a lessee after the deed was recorded.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“We are satisfied that the effect of said section 1183 is limited to the establishment of a lien upon the owner’s property, under the stated conditions, and does not extend to the point of imposing personal liability upon the owner”

“The trust deed was recorded prior to the execution of the lease, and prior to the transactions between appellants and the oil company.”

“The trust deed being of record before the liens of appellants attached to the property, the prior right of the trustees and of the bank is clearly recognized by section 1186 of the Code of Civil Procedure”

CONREY, P. J.

In these consolidated actions, the plaintiffs obtained a decree foreclosing liens held by them under the Mechanic’s Lien Law, on account of work done and labor furnished in performance of contracts made by the plaintiffs with defendant Lancaster Midway Oil Company in connection with the drilling of an oil well on property leased to the company. The léase was made by defendants Francesco Vacca, Guiseppe Vacca, and Pasquale Vacca, who owned the property subject to a recorded deed of trust made by the owners to defendants Giannini and Pedrini, as trustees under a deed of trust given to secure a loan made to the owners by defendant Bank of Italy. The plaintiffs have appealed from those portions of the decree of foreclosure whereby the court refused to allow a personal judgment

[150]

against the defendant owners of the land, and from that portion of the decree which adjudged the right, claim or lien of the defendant Bank of Italy, under its deed of trust, to be prior and superior to the liens of the plaintiffs.

In support of their demand for personal judgment against the owners of the land, appellants rely upon that part of section 1183 of the Code of Civil Procedure which, after stating that persons performing labor upon a mining claim or upon any real property worked as a mine have a lien thereon for the value of such work or labor done- or materials furnished, declares that every contractor or other person having charge of any mining or work or labor performed in and about such property, either as lessee or under a working bond or contract thereon “shall be held to be the agent of the owner for the purposes of this chapter.”

We are satisfied that the effect of said section 1183 is limited to the establishment of a lien upon the owner’s property, under the stated conditions, and does not extend to the point of imposing personal liability upon the owner as a party to the contract. There is nothing in the decisions cited

(Higgins

Carlotta Gold Min. Co.,

148 Cal. 700 [113 Am. St. Rep. 344, 84 Pac. 758];

McClung

Beard v. Lancaster Midway Oil Co.

AI Brief

CONREY, P. J.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief