Pacific S. Home v. Protection Dist.
California Court of Appeal Sep 20, 1920 No. Civ. No. 3211.Published
Before: THOMAS, J. —
In this action damages are sought for an alleged interference by the defendant with the natural flow of the waters of the Santa Ana River.
There was served and filed a third amended complaint, to which a general demurrer was interposed and sustained *Page 327 without leave to amend. No judgment was given, made, or entered. The attempted appeal is from the order sustaining the demurrer.
[1] Such an order, under our law, is not appealable. (Sec. 963, Code Civ. Proc.)
The attempted appeal is dismissed.
Finlayson, P. J., and Weller, J., concurred.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)