Starkweather v. Eddy
California Court of Appeal Jan 22, 1932 No. Docket No. 8215.Published
Before: CRAIG, J.
The plaintiff and respondent moved to dismiss the appeal in the instant case upon the ground that *Page 122 the same was not pursued in this court within the time prescribed by law.
[1] Nothing more than the filing and serving of a notice of appeal appears to have been accomplished prior to expiration of the time for ordering a transcript. The motion to dismiss is not resisted, and since it falls squarely within the purview ofGeneral Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Holman, 63 Cal.App. 17 [217 P. 1086], said motion should be granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
Works, P.J., and Fricke, J., pro tem., concurred.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)