Milano v. Ratto

California Court of Appeal Jul 25, 1932 No. Docket No. 8415.Published

Before: SPENCE, J.

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court dismissed the appeal because the appellants defaulted in the trial court and the case was submitted on the briefs of a companion case, Milano v. Bulleri, which was decided concurrently.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be dismissed based on the reasoning provided in the companion case of Milano v. Bulleri.

Disposition. Dismissed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“For the reasons stated in the opinion in said last-named case, the appeal herein is dismissed.”

MEMORANDUM CASES. This is a companion case to Milano v. Bulleri, (No. 8414)ante, p. 72 [13 P.2d 521], in which the opinion was this day filed. [1] The appellant owners in the present case defaulted in the trial court and a judgment decreeing foreclosure of the lien was entered. The appeal in this case is submitted upon the briefs in Milano v. Bulleri. For the reasons stated in the opinion in said last-named case, the appeal herein is dismissed.

Nourse, P.J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred. *Page 785

Milano v. Ratto

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief