Hill v. Walsh
Before: Parker
PARKER, J.,
pro
tem.
This is an action in claim and delivery for the recovery of certain personal property. Plain
[196]
tiff had judgment for the return of the property, or for the value thereof, in case a return could not be made. From this judgment defendants appeal on the judgment-roll alone.
But one point is presented on the appeal. Appellants contend that the" judgment is too uncertain to be enforced, or enforceable, and that there is no description of the property sufficient to enable an officer executing the judgment to identify the property.
As indicated, we have before us the judgment-roll alone.
The complaint alleges, among other things, that certain personal property is in possession of defendants, and describes that property as follows:
Article Value
2 Buck rakes...........................$ 125.00
2 Mowers .........■................. 125.00
4 Wagons ........................'..... 200.00
5 Hay nets............................. 50.00
1 Grain binder......................... 70.00
1 Derrick and equipment................ 135.00
2 Side-delivery rakes...................., 135.00
2 Sulky rakes........................... 70.00
1 Tractor.............................. 1,350.00
Stoves and household goods.............. 175.00
1-500 gallon tank on wheels............' 90.00
1 Grain drill..................:........... 50.00
1 6-disc tractor plow................... 225.00
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)