Funge v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal Apr 16, 1931 No. Docket No. 7931.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus because the petitioner has an adequate remedy at law for the requested relief.

Issues

Whether a writ of mandamus is the appropriate remedy to compel a county clerk to pay money and annul a writ of execution.

Disposition. Denied

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Petitioner has a complete remedy in an action at law, if any exists, for the relief which he here seeks.”

“The application is therefore denied.”

THE COURT.

[1] Petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the county clerk of the city and county of San Francisco to pay petitioner a certain sum of money, together with exemplary damages, for issuing a certain execution in an action in which petitioner was a party. It is also prayed that the writ of execution referred to be annulled and set aside. Petitioner has a complete remedy in an action at law, if any exists, for the relief which he here seeks. The application is therefore denied. *Page 468

Funge v. Superior Court

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief