People v. Chaffin

California Court of Appeal Mar 1, 1927 No. Docket No. 963.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction and the order of the superior court because the appellant failed to file a brief or make an appearance for oral argument.

Issues

Whether the judgment and order should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.”

THE COURT.

The defendant was convicted in the superior court of Yolo County of a felony, to wit, the crime of committing certain lewd and lascivious acts upon and with the body of a certain female child under the age of fourteen years.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed in this court January 14, 1927. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the March calendar for oral argument. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.

People v. Chaffin

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief