Rogers v. Byers
California Court of Appeal Jul 6, 1905 No. No. 38.Published
Before: McLaughlin
Synopsis
Action upon Note and Absolute Promises—Ruling upon Appeal— Amended Complaint—Conditional Promises—New Cause op Action—Statute op Limitations.—Where the original complaint declared upon a note and upon absolute promises to pay the same, to take it out ol the bar of the statute, and upon a former appeal it was held that evidence of conditional promises did not support the complaint, an amended complaint setting up conditional promises in haec verba must be held to state a new cause of action, upon which the statute of limitations runs to the date of its filing, and if then barred, a finding to the contrary cannot be sustained.
The full opinion text for this decision hasn’t been ingested yet. Case metadata and citations are shown above.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)