Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners

California Court of Appeal Apr 7, 1920 No. Civ. No. 3156.Published

Before: THE COURT. —

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment based on the authority of the identical facts and legal reasoning established in a prior case between the same parties.

Issues

Whether the judgment should be affirmed based on the authority of a prior case with identical facts.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The facts in this case are identical with those set forth in the case of Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners, ante, p. 29, [190 P. 51], and on the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.”

[1] The facts in this case are identical with those set forth in the case of Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners, ante, p. 29, [190 P. 51], and on the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 3, 1920.

Angellotti, C. J., Wilbur, J., Lennon, J., and Sloane, J., concurred.

Shaw, J., Lawlor, J., and Olney, J., dissented. *Page 794

Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief