Petitt v. Industrial Acc. Com.

California Court of Appeal Jul 10, 1920 No. Civ. No. 3387.Published

Before: THE COURT. —

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court denied the petition because the petitioner failed to comply with supreme court rules requiring the inclusion of all material evidence regarding the commission's findings.

Issues

Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the commission's conclusion that the petitioner's disability terminated on September 8, 1919.
Whether the petition complied with supreme court rules regarding the presentation of material evidence.

Disposition. Denied

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The petition, therefore, fails to comply with the rules promulgated by the supreme court (subd. 4, Rule XXVI, 183 Pac. viii).”

[1] The petition, in substance and effect, is based upon a want of evidence sufficient to warrant the conclusion of the commission that petitioner's disability terminated September 8, 1919. No attempt is made to state "all the material evidence" relative to this point. The petition, therefore, fails to comply with the rules promulgated by the supreme court (subd. 4, Rule XXVI, 183 Pac. viii).

Petition denied.

*Page 473

Petitt v. Industrial Acc. Com.

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief