People v. Valenzuela
Before: James
Synopsis
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County and from an order denying a new trial. Z. B. West, Judge.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
JAMES, J.
Appellant was charged with the crime of murder, and upon being found guilty of manslaughter was sentenced to serve a term of ten years imprisonment in the state prison. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
A young man named Delbert D. Wardlow was shot on the evening of March 19, 1914, at the house of appellant at Talbert, in Orange County. Several gunshot wounds were inflicted upon his body, after which Wardlow mounted a horse
[419]
and rode to a nearby store, where he died. Death was caused by the loss of blood from a wound in the thigh where a bullet had s'evered the femoral artery. Appellant is a Mexican and was engaged as a common laborer near the place of his residence and occupied a small frame building with his family, which consisted of a wife and children. At his house he served boarders other than members of his family, and also sold liquor to persons who might come there for it. On the date mentioned young Wardlow and a man named Stafford rode up to the house of appellant and purchased some beer which they drank on the premises. At that time appellant was away at his work and his wife furnished the liquor to Wardlow and his companion. While the two men were still in the house, the father of Wardlow joined them and together the three drank more beer which they purchased from the wife of appellant. Toward evening appellant with a man named Vasquez returned to the house. Appellant was well acquainted with the Wardlows and the men were apparently friends. Young Wardlow, however, sought to quarrel with Vasquez, who was not offending him at the time, and either struck or pushed Vasquez about in the dining-room, where the four men then were. Appellant remonstrated with the elder Wardlow, and thereupon, the latter became abusive also, but soon desisted from any offensive action. Meanwhile appellant retired to an adjoining room and Vasquez made his way past Stafford, who was holding a door to prevent him from going out of the room. Stafford testified that he heard young Wardlow’s voice, as he apparently addressed appellant in the other room, saying to the latter, in substance, “you dare not shoot.” Stafford further testified that the two men went outside, young Wardlow following appellant; that he next saw appellant fire twice at Ward-low, and at the same time Vasquez approached from the rear and fired three shots at the deceased; that Wardlow called to the witness and stated that they (meaning the Mexicans) “had got him,” and asked Stafford to get his horse. Stafford brought one of the. horses to young Wardlow, who mounted the same and rode in the direction of the store, where he died shortly afterward. Appellant testifying on behalf of himself denied that he had fired any shots, but, of course, the question as to the sufficiency of the evidence was a matter solely for the jury to determine in the face of
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)