People v. Wilson
Before: Conrey
Synopsis
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
CONREY, P. J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of murder in the second degree and sentenced to imprisonment for the term of twenty years. His appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The principal assignment of error refers to the court’s instruction to the jury that it might find the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree, or murder in the second degree, or not guilty, and the court’s refusal to add to these alternatives an instruction that they might, if the evidence warranted it, find him guilty of manslaughter. The general rule is, as stated in the Penal Code, section 1159, that “the jury may find the defendant guilty of any offense, the commission of which is necessarily included in that with which he is charged, or of an attempt to commit the offense. ’ ’ The attorney-general has called our attention to decisions of the supreme court which hold that in a prosecution for .murder the' refusal of the court to instruct the jury that they may return a verdict of manslaughter is not error, if the evidence clearly shows that the crime committed was not manslaughter.
(People
v.
Lee Gam,
69 Cal. 552, [11 Pac. 183];
People
v.
Fellows,
122 Cal. 233, [54 Pac. 830], and other eases cited in those decisions.) We do not question the rules as stated, but they are not applicable to the record in this case. Brinkley, the deceased, was about 23 years old, and an attachment had grown up between him and a fifteen year old daughter of the defendant. The defendant had informed his daughter that he was opposed to her association with Brinkley, and had sent to the young man information to the same effect. On the morning of June 6, 1915, Brinkley went out riding on a motorcycle with defendant’s daughter. The defendant purchased a revolver and started down the road in the direction they had taken. The defendant testified that he saw them coming toward him on the motorcycle and waved his hands, but they seemed to be coming faster. He testified further as follows: “Then I thought if I would pull the gun out of my pocket and wave
[565]
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)