People v. Zmak

California Court of Appeal Jan 11, 1923 No. Crim. No. 650.Published

Before: FINCH, P. J. —

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction for maintaining a place where alcoholic liquor is kept for sale and distribution in no-license territory after finding the evidence of guilt was conclusive.

Issues

Whether the judgment of conviction should be affirmed in the absence of an appellant's brief or appearance for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“An examination of the transcript shows that the appellant was fairly tried and convicted on evidence which was conclusive of guilt.”

“The judgment is affirmed.”

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction of the crime of "maintaining a place where alcoholic liquor is kept for sale and distribution" in no-license territory.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed July 15, 1922. No brief has been filed on behalf of appellant. The appeal came on regularly for oral argument on the third day of January, 1923. No appearance was made for appellant.

An examination of the transcript shows that the appellant was fairly tried and convicted on evidence which was conclusive of guilt.

The judgment is affirmed.

Burnett, J., and Hart, J., concurred. *Page 412

People v. Zmak

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief