People v. Murray

California Court of Appeal Mar 2, 1931 No. Docket No. 1149.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's felony conviction pursuant to Penal Code section 1253 because the appellant failed to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Issues

Whether a judgment should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.”

THE COURT.

[1] The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court of Stanislaus County of a felony, to wit: Violating "An Act to Regulate the Sale and Use of Poisons in the State of California and Providing a Penalty for the Violation Thereof." (Stats. 1907, p. 124.)

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court January 17, 1931. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on March 2, 1931. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.

People v. Murray

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief