In Re St. John

California Court of Appeal Sep 3, 1929 No. Docket No. 1882.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court held that the evidence presented in the contempt proceeding was sufficient to support the finding that the defendant possessed the financial ability to comply with the court's payment order.

Issues

Whether the evidence was sufficient to support a finding of financial ability to comply with a court order in a contempt proceeding.

Disposition. Remanded to custody

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“the evidence before the Superior Court, in the contempt proceeding, was sufficient to justify that court in finding that the defendant was then and there financially able to make the payments required of him by the court's order.”

THE COURT.

[1] It appears that the evidence before the Superior Court, in the contempt proceeding, was sufficient to justify that court in finding that the defendant was then and there financially able to make the payments required of him by the court's order. (Inre Rasmussen, 56 Cal.App. 368 [205 P. 72].)

It is therefore ordered that the petitioner be and he hereby is remanded to custody. *Page 478

In Re St. John

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief