In Re Perfetti

California Court of Appeal Dec 8, 1927 No. Docket No. 1008.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court granted the petitioner's request for bail pending appeal, relying on the precedent established in In re Martinson.

Issues

Whether the petitioner should be admitted to bail pending appeal of a misdemeanor conviction under the Juvenile Court Law.

Disposition. Granted

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Upon the authority in that case the petitioner is admitted to bail, pending appeal, upon giving a bond in the sum of $1,500, with sureties approved by a judge of the superior court of Sonoma County.”

THE COURT.

The petitioner above named was convicted of a misdemeanor for an offense committed against the Juvenile Court Law of the state of California (Deering's Gen. Laws 1923, Act No. 3966), and has appealed to this court from such conviction. Bail, pending appeal, was denied by the superior court. [1] Every legal question involved in this proceeding is identical with those considered in the case of In re Martinson, ante, p. 393 [262 P. 474]. Upon the authority in that case the petitioner is admitted to bail, pending appeal, upon giving a bond in the sum of $1,500, with sureties approved by a judge of the superior court of Sonoma County.

*Page 1

In Re Perfetti

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief