People v. Ramirez

California Court of Appeal Feb 13, 1932 No. Docket No. 136.Published

Before: JENNINGS, J.

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction and sentence for first-degree murder because no brief was filed and no appearance was made on behalf of the appellant.

Issues

Whether the judgment and order should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and order are affirmed.”

The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court of Fresno County of a felony, to wit, murder *Page 698 in the first degree, and the jury by its verdict fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the state prison for life.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed in this court January 5, 1932. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on February 9, 1932. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and order are affirmed.

Barnard, P.J., and Marks, J., concurred.

People v. Ramirez

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief