People v. McDonald

California Court of Appeal Jul 1, 1931 No. Docket No. 1160.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction for attempted robbery because the appellant failed to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Issues

Whether the judgment and order should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.”

THE COURT.

The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court of Sacramento County of a felony, to wit: Attempt to commit robbery.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed in this court May 15, 1931. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on July 1, 1931. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed. *Page 326

People v. McDonald

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief