Sawyer v. Berger

CONREY, P. J.

In this case a writ of

mandamus

issued to the defendant Berger, as auditor of the county of San Bernardino, requiring him to issue to the plaintiff a warrant on the treasurer of San Bernardino County in the sum of seventy-five dollars for plaintiff’s salary for the month of May, 1916, as constable of Upland township. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

On November 3, 1914, the plaintiff was elected to said office of constable. Thereafter he duly qualified and at noon on the fourth day of January, 1915, entered upon the duties of the office for the term beginning that day. Ever since the date last mentioned he has been the duly elected, qualified, and acting constable of Upland township. He is entitled to the salary claimed by him, amounting to seventy-five dollars per month in accordance with the provisions of section 4237 of the Political Code, unless the salary to which he is entitled was reduced to the sum of sixty-five dollars per month by virtue of an ordinance of the board of supervisors of the county of San Bernardino, which ordinance was “passed,

[568]

adopted and approved as an urgency measure,” after noon on the fourth day of January, 1915, which was the first Monday after the first day of that month. By the terms of that ordinance the compensation of constables in the various townships in the county of San Bernardino was declared to be a fixed salary, and it was provided that the constable in and for Upland township should receive $780 per annum. The monthly installments of such salary would be sixty-five dollars. Upon due proceedings had as permitted by section

7y%

of article XI of the Constitution of the state of California, a charter for the county of San Bernardino, was adopted at the general election of November, 1912, which charter was duly approved by the legislature in April, 1913. (Stats. 1913, p. 1652.) By article III, section 3, of the charter, it is provided that the salaries of justices of the peace and constables shall be fixed by the board of supervisors, and that such salaries need not be uniform. Other provisions of the charter, pertinent to the present inquiry, are the following: Article VII, section 1: “In all cases in which the board of supervisors are authorized by law or by this charter to fix the compensation of any officer, such salary shall be fixed prior to the election or appointment of such officer, and shall not be increased or diminished during the term for which such officer shall be elected or appointed.” Article VII, section 6: “ This charter, in so far as it relates to the nomination and election of supervisors and township officers, shall take effect and be in force from and after the time of its approval by the legislature, and as to all other matters it shall take effect and be in force from and after 12 o’clock, noon, of the first Monday after the first day of January, 1915.” Article VII, section 5, referring to persons in office “at the time this charter goes into effect,” says: “Nor shall anything in this charter be construed as changing or affecting the compensation of any such officer during the term for which he shall have been elected. ’ ’