Pierson v. Pierson

California Court of Appeal Mar 9, 1911 No. Civ. No. 960.Published

Before: THE COURT. —

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court reversed the judgment and remanded the case for a new trial because the trial court failed to sign or file findings of fact sufficient to support the judgment.

Issues

Whether the absence of signed or filed findings of fact constitutes reversible error in a divorce action.

Disposition. reversed and remanded

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“no findings sufficient to support a judgment were by the court signed or filed in the cause”

“it is, therefore, ordered that the judgment in the above-entitled cause be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.”

Action for divorce. The parties hereto, through their respective attorneys, having filed a stipulation that reversible error exists in the record, and upon examination of such record it appearing that findings of fact were not waived, and that no findings sufficient to support a judgment were by the court signed or filed in the cause, it is, therefore, ordered that the judgment in the above-entitled cause be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Pierson v. Pierson

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief