Western Ind. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

California Court of Appeal Jul 10, 1920 No. Civ. No. 3378.Published

Before: THE COURT. —

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court denied the petition for review because the Industrial Accident Commission's findings were sufficiently supported by the evidence and the petitioner failed to file a reply to the Commission's answer.

Issues

Whether the findings of the Industrial Accident Commission were supported by the evidence.

Disposition. Petition denied.

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“the findings of which petitioner complains are sufficiently supported by the evidence.”

[1] The Industrial Accident Commission has served and filed an answer from which it appears that the findings of which petitioner complains are sufficiently supported by the evidence. Petitioner has neglected to file a reply to the answer, though the privilege of such a reply is accorded him by the rules promulgated by the supreme court (subd. 4, Rule XXVI, 183 Pac. viii).

Petition denied.

*Page 474

Western Ind. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief