In Re Stovall
California Court of Appeal Jan 22, 1934 No. Docket No. 2493.Published
Before: STEPHENS, P.J.
Petitioner was regularly bound over to the superior court for trial for pandering. [1] He complains to this court that there was not sufficient evidence produced at the hearing to legally justify his being held for trial.
There is sufficient evidence to justify the belief that such a crime was committed in his residence. There is evidence of his implication and knowledge.
The writ is discharged.
Craig, J., and Archbald, J., pro tem., concurred. *Page 323
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)