People v. Arter

California Court of Appeal May 31, 1928 No. Docket No. 1465.Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction for grand theft after finding upon independent review of the record that the defendant received a fair trial.

Issues

Whether the defendant's conviction for grand theft was supported by a fair trial.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“We have, nevertheless, examined the record and are satisfied that he was fairly tried and convicted.”

THE COURT.

The defendant and Bert Palmer were jointly charged with the crime of grand theft. They were tried before a jury and both convicted, but the trial court granted Palmer a new trial. [1] The defendant has appealed from the judgment following his conviction and from the order denying him a new trial, but has not supported his appeal by either brief or oral argument. We have, nevertheless, examined the record and are satisfied that he was fairly tried and convicted.

Judgment and order affirmed. *Page 329

People v. Arter

AI Brief

THE COURT.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief