Hall v. Superior Court
Before: James
Synopsis
Insane Persons—Proceedings for Commitment—Sufficiency of Complaint.—An affidavit or complaint alleging that a certain person is insane and so disordered in mind as to endanger himself and others; that on a certain day he “acted in a strange and incoherent manner, and was laboring under the delusion that persons were whispering and talking to him, and that he was afflicted with what he called a ‘whisperee’ and by buzzes, and was laboring under the delusion that there were parties who desired to drive him from Southern California; that by reason of said insanity said person is dangerous to be at large,” contains a sufficient statement of facts to give the court jurisdiction to proceed and examine the charge made.
Id.—Affidavit or Complaint—Statement of Conclusion.—It is not a statement of a conclusion merely for the complainant to say, in such affidavit or complaint, that the petitioner was “laboring under the delusion that persons were whispering and talking to him. . . . and was laboring under the delusion that there were parties who desired to drive him from Southern California.”
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)